I've been out of the military since 2009, so those who are serving still may very well offer better advice. Any of these situations could cause a problem within a unit if other Soldiers or leaders perceiving favoritism or personal gain between the parties involved. Any relationship between Soldiers of different ranks, which is too personal in nature, will cause problems in a unit -- it's simply a matter of time. The Army has recently released an update to Army Regulation 600-20, Army Command Policy, which better defines these issues for leaders and Soldiers. By the time I retired in the 90's it was a lot harder. I am an example-leading, line-toting, love-to-mentor chica, but what I do know is that ultimately the heart wants what it wants. Then in early 80's on a little communication station with only 3 officers, 80 enlisted and 150 dependents.
We all know what the regulations say--no go. No Romeo and Juliets that I recall, but one or both careers ruined. Maybe the Coast Guard is a little harder on it than the Marine Corps? In the case of Army National Guard or United States Army Reserve personnel, this prohibition does not apply to relationships that exist due to their civilian occupation or employment. Soldiers and leaders often discuss terms such as fraternization, inappropriate relationships and prohibited relationships interchangeably; causing plenty of confusion. Want a quick boot from the Coast Guard, hook up with an enlisted member while you're an officer.
Soldiers can always speak to their chain of command, the Staff Judge Advocate Legal Assistance Team or the Inspector General to get clarification. It is the Marine who should ask this question, and he should first go through his chain of command when asking that question. How about senior officers and junior officers. The prohibited relationships, which apply to both opposite-gender and same-gender relationships include: --Ongoing business relationships. The general rules that we followed were: company grade or field grade stay within those realms, one up or one day in rank to cover situations like Capt and Maj , no enlisted. I see it fairly often around me anyway. This prohibition does not apply to— 1 Marriages that predate the effective date of this policy or entered into prior to March 1, 2000.
But very frowned upon by the Officer wives. Funny because more enlisted are college educated than ever. This is why the Army expressly prohibits relationships that meet any of the five criteria. The rules or how they were applied in the 70's are different than now. Why is enlisted and Officer a No-No.
Commanders have a wide range of responses available including counseling, reprimand, order to cease, reassignment, administrative action or adverse action. Other than Chain Of Command dating between ranks used to be most times overlooked if it is not flaunted in the face of the permanent party. You have sought an avenue for answers here to get assistance with the question, which means you already know how to utilize one great resource. I've also seen very odd combinations that I raised my eyebrows at but never saw addressed. Recruiters and permanent party personnel assigned or attached to the U. She was Aviation branch, he was Infantry. It did make finding assignments more challenging, though the beauty of being Infantry and Signal Corps meant that there were always reasonable Army duty stations that had some slots we could fill.
All officers know exactly what fraternization is…violation is considered a willful offense, conduct unbecoming. The Marine can start planning now on if it will take a marriage to make it work. Some even got married and kept it quiet. One was my best man when I was married. None of these relationships require any element of a sexual nature; they simply have to cause an actual or perceived situation, which negatively impacts a unit's good order and discipline.
In the military today you have so much diversity and outside contact that it can be hard to control all aspects of fraternization. Today's military gives thousands of avenues for advice in one place. As for dating other officers- when we were both Captains, I married a woman who became the best looking Colonel in the Army, which means that she did better than me in her career and certainly is far smarter and far far better looking to boot. I have seen and heard of many Officer-Enlisted pairings---married and serious dating. Fraternization opportunities were, to say the least, rare.
Conduct, that constitutes fraternization is not excused or mitigated by a subsequent marriage or declared relationship between offending parties. Prohibited personal relationships between officers and enlisted personnel include On-going business relationships between officers and enlisted personnel. Sort of a mythical creature we'd heard about but sightings were few, i. Both were enlisted when they married - it wasn't even an issue as I recall. I would agree that it shouldn't be an issue as long as they weren't in the same chain of command. I don't think that there is any ucmj prohibition against officers dating or marrying enlisted as long as they aren't in the same chain of command. Commanders will ensure that personal relationships which exist between Soldiers of different ranks emanating from their civilian careers will not influence training, readiness, or personnel actions.